Korea - A Nation of Immigrants?
By Robert Koehler
Marmot's Hole Blog
August 22, 2007
More stuff
on the need to
accept ethnic diversity in Korea, this
time from the Korea Herald.
Interestingly, the Korea Herald editorial starts thusly:
Korea’s older generations had been taught to take pride in having an
ethnically homogeneous fatherland. Racial homogeneity formed the basis of
the 5,000-year history of the nation, which was interrupted for 35 years in
the 20th century by the Japanese occupation. So, the national identity of
the Korean race was emphasized as the source of power and spirit in the
struggle against Japanese imperialism.
Now, this is questionable on two counts. Firstly, it follows the same logic
reportedly presented by the Korean delegation
to the UNHRC Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, namely,
that the Korean concept of ethnic homogeneity and “pure-bloodedness” was
born as a defense measure in response to (mainly) Japanese imperialism. The
reality may have been more complicated, however — other factors included the
popularity among East Asian intellectuals of
European racialist and Social Darwinist thought at the turn of the 20th
century (see also
here) and the adoption of Japanese
models by Korea’s post-independence economic and political elite.
But ultimately, the question of how the concept of Korean ethnic purity
became an ideological pillar of post-independence Korean society may be
irrelevant, since the supposed ethnic homogeneity upon which the concept
rested might be complete myth… and a recent one at that.
One of the more interesting columns I’ve read since the UNHRC censure — and
a lot of ink has been spilled on the matter —
was
one by the JoongAng Ilbo’s Lee Hun-beom
that appeared in the Aug 20 issue of that paper.
Lee began by recalling a story from 1995, when members of Korea’s Hwasan Lee
family were granted the same legal status in Vietnam as Vietnamese citizens.
Why? Because the Hwasan Lee family are actually descendants of the Ly
family, the ruling family of the Vietnamese
Ly Dynasty (1009—1225). When the Ly
Dynasty was overthrown in 1225, the royal family was massacred, but an uncle
of the last emperor managed to escape, eventually landing in Hwasan in
present-day North Korea. The Goryeo king conferred unto him a lordship and
the clan name Hwasan Lee. Today’s Hwasan Lee family trace their ancestry
back to this Vietnamese royal.
Lee Hun-beom points out that the Hwasan Lee family isn’t the only such
example. The Gimhae Heo family trace their lineage back to
King Suro of Geumgwan Gaya and his
Indian wife. The Deoksu Jang family,
meanwhile, are the descendants of
Jang Sun-nyong, a Muslim Uyghur
attendant to a Mongol princess sent to marry the the Goryeo king.
Yi Ji-ran, a general who served as Yi
Seong-gye’s right hand in the establishment of the Joseon kingdom and
progenitor of the Cheonghae Lee family, was a
Jurchen. Then there’s
General Sayaga, one of Kato Kiyomasa’s
commanders during the Imjin War, who liked Korea so much he decided to
defect to the other side (bringing with him matchlock technology). He was
eventually granted the Korean name Kim Chung-seon of the Gimhae Kim clan.
Lee says that the number of such cases is surprisingly large, and the
national gene pool proves it. A Japanese study from 2003 revealed that only
40 percent of the Korean DNA is uniquely Korean. 22 percent is similar to
DNA found in China, while 17 percent is similar to that found in Okinawa.
This would suggest there’s a fair amount of common DNA between Korea, China
and Japan thanks to brisk human exchanges that have been going on since
ancient times. A Korean study turned up the same results.
“This is the reality of the ethnic homogeneity we’ve been so proud of,”
wrote Lee.
Along the same lines, Go Gi-bok contributed to OhMyNews back in May
a review of Park Gi-hyeon’s book “Immigrant Clans
That Changed Our History,” which argues that the Korean “race” is
essentially a big japtang, a mixture of
different ingredients that developed over time a sense of unity within the
big mixing bowl otherwise known as the Korean Peninsula.
The book apparently examines the stories of Korea’s many immigrants,
including the ones mentioned above and a few others like
Park Yeon, a Dutch sailor who was
shipwrecked in Korea in 1627 but eventually became royal cannon maker and
fought for the Korean side during the Manchu invasion of late 1636. But more
importantly, the book notes that Korea used to play the role of sanctuary
for peoples escaping war and natural disasters in China and Manchuria. In
particular, floods of immigrants would come to Korea during chaotic period
in Chinese history, such as the Three Kingdoms period, the fall of the Tang
Dynasty and fall of the Sung Dynasty, and these immigrants had a great
influence on the culture.
The Goryeo kingdom was especially keen on courting immigrants, a policy
continued even by the rulers of the Joseon kingdom, who used immigration as
a means to keep the Jurchen in line and protect Korea’s northern frontier.
According to Park, some 46 percent of Korea’s current family names are, in
fact, immigrant names, and 20 percent of Korea’s population are descendants
of immigrants from Manchuria, China, Japan, Vietnam, Central Asia, the
Netherlands and elsewhere.
Of course, don’t tell any of this to
the North Koreans, who ironically
enough may be the biggest japtang on the
peninsula, living as they do in a region that saw considerable migration
throughout Korean history.